| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. ROFL, ME has been robbed!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: nano bobcat on 12/04/2011 09:43:36 Trina, if thats true, you're my personal hero!!! This robbery might be a strong punch in the balls on the eastern defense front of NC territory :-D
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.12 09:43:00
|
2. ROFL, ME has been robbed!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
awesome if this is not a troll :-D
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.12 09:30:00
|
3. Dear CCP - You broke nullsec... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: nano bobcat on 12/04/2011 09:23:29 Originally by: Viktor Klimenko You people and people in CCP forget that biggest alliances can't really be taken down by few smaller ones allying together, its a comfortable excuse, but...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.12 09:21:00
|
4. Dear CCP - You broke nullsec... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: AstarothPrime Hi, Im small aliance, a.k.a. renter. then, you should go die in a fire... or form a bigger entity and get you a better place.
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.12 09:08:00
|
5. With the Sanctum nerf came the AFK cloackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: FeralShadow Also, afk cloaking kinda goes against the "laws of Eve". There's zero risk, yet high reward. sitting at deep ass 0.0 is riskless also if you arent a total noob. Watch local, if a red appears (reported in int...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.12 08:38:00
|
6. CCP plan to improve 0.0 by turning 80% to "dross" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ioci It isn't going to get the effect though. That's the argument. Every Faction 0.0 sec region is controlled by the power Blocs too. And that has nothing to do with SOV. It's about having Nyx fleets and Titans to bridge ou...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.05 16:48:00
|
7. Why is PI so crap? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: nano bobcat on 05/04/2011 16:27:20 Originally by: Whitehound - It takes forever to figure out which planet and resource is profitable. - It still requires endless fiddling with the mouse to get it set up. - The profits are a...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.05 16:25:00
|
8. Am I the only Idiot that trained Black Ops to 5? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
im still planning to train BO V in the near future for 30% more ECM strength of my widow =)
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.05 16:05:00
|
9. CCP plan to improve 0.0 by turning 80% to "dross" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
the sov upgrades you are talking all the time about, have paid themselves out 20x already, so stop whining. As well as outposts, which are not paid with ratting money but from alliance income (moon goo). Well, putting them there was your risk and ...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.05 16:02:00
|
10. CCP plan to improve 0.0 by turning 80% to "dross" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: nano bobcat on 05/04/2011 12:25:50 Originally by: Rainus Max "Hmm angry people, well look into it" "Screw it, deploy anyway" people are always angry as you take them something away, no reason against well placed balancing...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.05 12:24:00
|
11. what will happen to 0.0 now ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gillaboo For every "rage-quit", there will be THREE others looking to take advantage of the fresh opportunities created by the departures. There Is Much To Be Learned. this!
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.05 12:20:00
|
12. Hi-sec Carebears FTW - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: nano bobcat on 05/04/2011 10:13:16 Originally by: Karl Planck If 80% of all CHARACTERS are based in high sec it is no suprise at all. Most random toons are in high sec as well as most alts. Which means that 66% of each accou...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.05 10:11:00
|
13. CCP plan to improve 0.0 by turning 80% to "dross" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Twylla Expected consequences Quote: Some alliances will immediately start wanting to look for better space In the longer run, there'll be more conflicts going on, with more localized goals My take: Conflicts will...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.05 09:58:00
|
14. what will happen to 0.0 now ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: 5n4keyes Personally, I expect alot of people to send atleast one alt to empire for running missions, given that the agent quality is being removed, it kinda means you can mission run pretty close to where most alliances have...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.05 09:45:00
|
15. CCP plan to improve 0.0 by turning 80% to "dross" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: nano bobcat on 04/04/2011 14:15:00 Originally by: Nilhium Spoken like a whiny ***** incapable of making friends or negotiating with his neighbors. " I can't figure out how to master the social aspects of the game, you must ...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.04 14:11:00
|
16. CCP plan to improve 0.0 by turning 80% to "dross" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: nano bobcat on 04/04/2011 13:43:52 yes, it will only bankrupt their poor pets :-D Originally by: Grimpak Originally by: fire elf instead the small alliances. small alliances *sigh* Those usually prefer hiding un...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.04 13:41:00
|
17. Afk Cloakers and why they think its a good idea - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
because it doesnt work that way. They would always out-afk/camp you to death in every situation due to their home location advantages.
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.04 12:32:00
|
18. Afk Cloakers and why they think its a good idea - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
dont think so. The trick of afk-cloaking is to deny you the information about your activity, for that they are called "afk cloakers". Without the "afk" in cloaker there is no information denial, which makes the main part of why they are dangerous....
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.04 12:07:00
|
19. Afk Cloakers and why they think its a good idea - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 0.0 SHOULD BE DANGEROUS TO EVERYONE, INCLUDING INATTENTIVE AFK CLOAKERS. but, a danger for afk cloakers means they arent a danger anymore and the bears are fully safe again, since afk cloakers are the ...
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.04 11:54:00
|
20. Afk Cloakers and why they think its a good idea - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
afk cloakers are fine and simply a counter to local . You use local to detect enemy activity, afk cloakers stay in local for hours/days in order to make local useless for you in respect of that guy activity intel.
- by nano bobcat - at 2011.04.04 10:23:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |